Surgical Clamp Customized Request Medical Equipment Transforaminal Instrument

1 Introduction:
All endoscopes are designed and manafactured by the latest optics thechnology, and using the highest quality material. If you are looking for minimally invasive surgery medical instruments with good quality, competitive price and reliable service. Wanhe medcal is manufaturing these for you. We provide general and professional laparoscopic instruments with CE, FDA approved. 




  
2 Packing & Shipping:

3 Company Show

 

FAQ

 

---

 

What is minimally invasive orthopedic surgery and how is it different from conventional surgery?

 

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery is a surgical method that does not require large incisions on the skin and uses various endoscopic methods to treat and treat lesions. This surgical method includes minimally invasive fracture surgery, arthroscopic minimally invasive surgery, etc., and can observe and treat affected areas through endoscopic surgery, such as lumbar disc herniation, lumbar stenosis and other diseases.

Compared with traditional conventional surgery, minimally invasive orthopedic surgery has the following significant features:

Minimally invasive: Minimally invasive surgery usually requires only smaller incisions, reducing dissection and destruction of surrounding soft tissue, thereby reducing postoperative pain and recovery time.

Less bleeding: Because the trauma is smaller, the amount of bleeding during surgery is also reduced, which helps reduce the risk of infection.

Low complication rate: Due to less trauma and disruption, minimally invasive surgery has a lower complication rate, such as a lower risk of infection and poor fracture healing.

Fast recovery: Minimally invasive surgery can speed up patient recovery, shorten hospitalization time and postoperative exhaust time, and improve patient satisfaction.

High accuracy: Using advanced imaging technology and special instruments (such as arthroscopes and endoscopes), doctors can operate under visual conditions, improving the accuracy and safety of surgery.

Wide range of indications: Minimally invasive techniques have been widely used in multiple fields such as foot and ankle, sports medicine, spine and trauma, and are considered the preferred treatment method in some cases.

In short, minimally invasive orthopedic surgery, with its advantages of less trauma, faster recovery, and fewer complications, is gradually becoming an important development direction of orthopedic surgery, providing patients with safer and more effective treatment options.

 

---

 

What are the latest technological advances in minimally invasive orthopedic surgery?

 

 

The latest technological progress in minimally invasive orthopedic surgery mainly focuses on the following aspects:

Robot-assisted surgery: With the development of artificial intelligence and embedded computer technology, minimally invasive surgical robots are showing a strong development trend in the field of orthopedics. These robots can not only perform diagnosis and treatment business processes such as endoscopy, brain surgery, and capillary intervention, but also develop in the direction of intelligence, remoteness, master-slave control, and full-process assistance.

Intelligent navigation and three-dimensional imaging technology: Use the O-arm 3D navigation system to plan and simulate three-dimensional images before surgery to provide the surgeon with the best surgical path. During the operation, the patient can receive a complete 360-degree automatic ring scan, which can correct the doctor's deviations at any time to avoid injury.

Radiofrequency modulation and interventional neuromodulation: These techniques are used to treat spinal pain and are widely used in minimally invasive spinal techniques.

Endoscopic fusion and dual-channel endoscopic (UBE) technology: These technologies allow one operation to achieve the effect of nerve root decompression on both sides, significantly improving surgical efficiency and effectiveness.

Magnetic navigation technology: As one of the most sophisticated projects, magnetic navigation technology is becoming an important direction for the development of minimally invasive technology.

Integration of medicine and engineering and interdisciplinarity: This interdisciplinary cooperation has gradually become a new hot spot in this field, promoting the continuous improvement and update of minimally invasive spine technology.

What is the specific comparative data on postoperative recovery time between minimally invasive orthopedic surgery and traditional surgery?
The specific comparative data on postoperative recovery time between minimally invasive orthopedic surgery and traditional surgery are as follows:

After bone resection using Piezosurgery® technology, the group using this technology showed more bone regeneration and fewer inflammatory cells within 3 days after surgery, and had a shorter postoperative recovery time compared with traditional surgery.

After total knee replacement, 30 knees in the minimally invasive incision group had complete recovery of skin sensory function on the outside of the incision, and 23 knees in the traditional incision group. There were significant differences in the area of ​​sensory impairment and incision length between the two groups at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery.

Minimally invasive surgery recovers faster than open surgery. You can return to normal life one month after minimally invasive surgery. You can get out of bed 6 hours after surgery. The urinary catheter can be removed after the infusion is completed on the day after surgery. You can eat semi-liquid food 24 hours after surgery. , you can be discharged from the hospital 3 days after the operation.

Patients with minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures can walk within 3 weeks after surgery, while traditional surgeries often take several hours and are accompanied by massive bleeding. Even though many patients endure these pains, they still find it difficult to fully recover and are left with lifelong problems. Disability.

The recovery time after minimally invasive surgery varies depending on the type of surgery and the patient's own situation. Generally, minor minimally invasive surgeries can be discharged from the hospital 1-2 days after surgery, while more complex minimally invasive surgeries mostly require within 3-5 days. recover.

Comparing the efficacy and recovery speed of conventional open pedicle screw internal fixation and minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation, the first ambulation time and the time to return to normal activities in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group.

Studies of preserving the integrity of the pronator quadratus muscle combined with volar locking plates in the treatment of distal radius fractures have shown that the average healing time of the modified surgical method is shorter than that of the traditional surgical method.

A comparative study on the efficacy of total hip replacement with small anterolateral incision and conventional posterolateral incision shows that the recovery time after traditional surgery is long (more than 6 months on average), while minimally invasive surgery has a shorter recovery time.

The advantages of minimally invasive surgery include small wounds, mild pain, quick recovery, short hospitalization time, and less bleeding. The advantages of traditional surgery are generally low cost, but the disadvantages include large wounds, severe pain, slow recovery, long hospitalization time, and excessive bleeding. .

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery is usually better than traditional surgery in terms of postoperative recovery time, which is manifested in shorter recovery time, shorter hospital stay, and reduced pain.

 

---

 

What are the detailed statistics on the incidence and types of complications in minimally invasive orthopedic surgery?

There are various statistics on the incidence and types of complications in minimally invasive orthopedic surgery, with different studies and cases showing varying results. Here are a few key statistics:

Traumatology and Orthopedics:

After the two groups of patients received different treatment methods, the incidence rate in the observation group (5%) was lower than that in the control group (28.5%), which was statistically significant.
Pelvic fracture:

The incidence of postoperative complications such as non-healing wounds and infection is as high as 25%.
Another study showed that the complication rate associated with subtrochanteric fractures was as high as 21%.
Spinal Trauma:

Research from Chongzuo People's Hospital shows that the complication rate in the minimally invasive surgery group is 1.67%, which is significantly lower than the 10.00% rate in the traditional open surgery group.
Complications include wound infection, deep vein thrombosis, and motor dysfunction.
Total hip replacement:

The various complications of the standard group were significantly lower than those of the first 100 cases, from 19.0% to 11.0%.
Fractures around the knee joint:

When minimally invasive internal fixation system (LISS) is used to treat complex fractures around the knee joint, the occurrence of postoperative complications requires detailed analysis.
These data suggest that minimally invasive surgery has certain advantages in reducing complications, especially when less invasive.

 

---

 

What are the application cases of minimally invasive orthopedic surgery in the treatment of different diseases?

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery has a wide range of application cases in the treatment of different diseases. Here are some specific examples:

Spinal disorders:

The Tongzhou Campus of Beijing Friendship Hospital has successfully used minimally invasive spinal endoscopic surgery to treat complex spinal diseases in the elderly, bringing hope and confidence in cure to elderly patients.
Two elderly couples with an average age of 87 underwent minimally invasive spinal endoscopic surgery at the hospital, and their low back and leg pain symptoms were quickly relieved after the operation.
Pediatric Orthopedics:

Chongqing Children's Hospital Jiangxi Hospital successfully treated a 5-year-old child's humeral lateral condyle fracture using minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery, demonstrating its professional capabilities in the field of pediatric orthopedics.
Hip disorders:

Minimally invasive hip arthroscopy can treat hip dysplasia, hip impingement, hip synovitis and other diseases. By repairing the hip labrum, removing debris from the joint, and removing inflammatory tissue, the patient's condition can be significantly improved.
Femoral neck fracture:

The Affiliated Central Hospital of Shenyang Medical College successfully completed Liaoning's first minimally invasive internal fixation surgery for a femoral neck fracture assisted by the Noiton HoloSight trauma orthopedic surgery robot, pioneering orthopedic robot-assisted surgery in Liaoning Province.
Thoracolumbar fractures:

The orthopedic team of Shanghai Hongkou District Jiangwan Hospital performed kyphoplasty (PCKP), successfully performed thoracic vertebral body fracture surgery, and used the Enhanced Recovery Surgery (ERAS) program to enable the patient to get out of bed and walk that afternoon.
Thoracic spinal stenosis:

In recent years, percutaneous endoscopic and unilateral dual-channel endoscopic techniques have shown significant advantages in the treatment of thoracic spinal stenosis, improving the treatment effect, reducing surgical trauma and complications, and accelerating patient recovery.

 

---

 

What are the survey results on patient satisfaction in minimally invasive orthopedic surgery?

Survey results on patient satisfaction with minimally invasive orthopedic surgery show that different types of minimally invasive surgery have significant advantages in improving patient satisfaction. The following are several specific research results:

Lumbar fusion: A study from the Department of Orthopedics at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, USA, showed that through a comprehensive analysis of the self-reported outcomes (PRO) of minimally invasive lumbar fusion patients, including expected PRO, real PRO and surgical satisfaction, it was found that preoperative The difference between MIS expectations and postoperative results has an impact on satisfaction with lumbar fusion surgery.

Total knee replacement: Based on a follow-up survey of 164 patients, minimally invasive orthopedics' total knee replacement can significantly improve patient satisfaction with knee flexion and prosthesis stability. However, approximately 20% of patients are dissatisfied with their surgical results, mainly due to postoperative pain and joint dysfunction. Another study pointed out that Minimally Invasive® Orthopedics' products restore the patient's natural anatomy through natural bionic design, thereby improving postoperative knee joint function and increasing patient satisfaction.

Orthopedic trauma treatment: A study by Neijiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital was based on the data of 68 patients. The observation group's satisfaction with minimally invasive techniques was 97.06%, which was higher than the control group's 67.65% (P<0.05). This shows that choosing minimally invasive techniques can speed up patient recovery, ensure prognostic effects, and ensure treatment safety.

Disc dislocation surgery: The Spring North Boss Magazine study looked at 150 patients, of whom 67% underwent surgery and 30% underwent minimally invasive disc dislocation surgery. The results showed that the surgery group showed higher satisfaction within one year after surgery and a significantly lower rate of seeking medical help for pain than patients who received only conservative treatment.

Spinal deformity surgery: One study compared patient satisfaction after open or minimally invasive open surgery and found that although minimally invasive surgery reduced perioperative complications, there was no difference in postoperative satisfaction between the two surgical approaches. clear.

Proximal articular fractures of the limbs: A study conducted by Sihong Zhongda Hospital based on data from 70 patients showed that the minimally invasive treatment of proximal articular fractures of the limbs with locking plates resulted in a shorter overall hospitalization time and less intraoperative blood loss, thus improving the patient's quality of life. Satisfaction.

Microdiscectomy (TFE): The study by Yeung and Tsou reported on 307 patients who met criteria for TFE and followed them for 1 year. The results showed that 91% of patients were satisfied with the results and would choose the procedure again.

These studies demonstrate that minimally invasive orthopedic surgery has significant advantages in improving patient satisfaction, particularly in reducing postoperative complications, accelerating recovery, and improving quality of life.

 

---

 

For more photos and details please contact me:
Company Name: Tonglu Wanhe Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.
Sales: Aiden